Abstract View
Journal of Climate
Article: pp. 153–192 | Full Text | PDF (6.38M)
Present-Day Atmospheric Simulations Using GISS ModelE: Comparison to In Situ, Satellite, and Reanalysis Data
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, and Center for Climate Systems Research, Columbia University, New York, New York
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, and SGT, Inc., New York, New York
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York
LSCE, CEA Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, and Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, New York
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
(Manuscript received 28 October 2004, in final form 6 March 2005)
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3612.1
Options:
Search CrossRef for:
Search Google Scholar for:
- Gavin A. Schmidt
- Reto Ruedy
- James E. Hansen
- Igor Aleinov
- Nadine Bell
- Mike Bauer
- Susanne Bauer
- Brian Cairns
- Vittorio Canuto
- Ye Cheng
- Anthony Del Genio
- Greg Faluvegi
- Andrew D. Friend
- Tim M. Hall
- Yongyun Hu
- Max Kelley
- Nancy Y. Kiang
- Dorothy Koch
- Andy A. Lacis
- Jean Lerner
- Ken K. Lo
- Ron L. Miller
- Larissa Nazarenko
- Valdar Oinas
- Jan Perlwitz
- Judith Perlwitz
- David Rind
- Anastasia Romanou
- Gary L. Russell
- Makiko Sato
- Drew T. Shindell
- Peter H. Stone
- Shan Sun
- Nick Tausnev
- Duane Thresher
- Mao-Sung Yao
A full description of the ModelE version of the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) atmospheric general circulation model (GCM) and results are presented for present-day climate simulations (ca. 1979). This version is a complete rewrite of previous models incorporating numerous improvements in basic physics, the stratospheric circulation, and forcing fields. Notable changes include the following: the model top is now above the stratopause, the number of vertical layers has increased, a new cloud microphysical scheme is used, vegetation biophysics now incorporates a sensitivity to humidity, atmospheric turbulence is calculated over the whole column, and new land snow and lake schemes are introduced. The performance of the model using three configurations with different horizontal and vertical resolutions is compared to quality-controlled in situ data, remotely sensed and reanalysis products. Overall, significant improvements over previous models are seen, particularly in upper-atmosphere temperatures and winds, cloud heights, precipitation, and sea level pressure. Data–model comparisons continue, however, to highlight persistent problems in the marine stratocumulus regions.
© 2009 American Meteorological Society Privacy Policy and Disclaimer
Headquarters: 45 Beacon Street Boston, MA 02108-3693
DC Office: 1120 G Street, NW, Suite 800 Washington DC, 20005-3826
amsinfo@ametsoc.org Phone: 617-227-2425
Fax: 617-742-8718
Allen Press, Inc. assists in the online publication of AMS journals.


