Abstract View
Monthly Weather Review
Article: pp. 3644–3656 | Full Text | PDF (1012K)
Using Stochastically Generated Subcolumns to Represent Cloud Structure in a Large-Scale Model
CIRES/Climate Diagnostics Center, and NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado
NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey
Atmospheric Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California
(Manuscript received 9 December 2005, in final form 27 February 2006)
DOI: 10.1175/MWR3257.1
A new method for representing subgrid-scale cloud structure in which each model column is decomposed into a set of subcolumns has been introduced into the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory’s global atmospheric model AM2. Each subcolumn in the decomposition is homogeneous, but the ensemble reproduces the initial profiles of cloud properties including cloud fraction, internal variability (if any) in cloud condensate, and arbitrary overlap assumptions that describe vertical correlations. These subcolumns are used in radiation and diagnostic calculations and have allowed the introduction of more realistic overlap assumptions. This paper describes the impact of these new methods for representing cloud structure in instantaneous calculations and long-term integrations. Shortwave radiation computed using subcolumns and the random overlap assumption differs in the global annual average by more than 4 W m−2 from the operational radiation scheme in instantaneous calculations; much of this difference is counteracted by a change in the overlap assumption to one in which overlap varies continuously with the separation distance between layers. Internal variability in cloud condensate, diagnosed from the mean condensate amount and cloud fraction, has about the same effect on radiative fluxes as does the ad hoc tuning accounting for this effect in the operational radiation scheme. Long simulations with the new model configuration show little difference from the operational model configuration, while statistical tests indicate that the model does not respond systematically to the sampling noise introduced by the approximate radiative transfer techniques introduced to work with the subcolumns.
© 2009 American Meteorological Society Privacy Policy and Disclaimer
Headquarters: 45 Beacon Street Boston, MA 02108-3693
DC Office: 1120 G Street, NW, Suite 800 Washington DC, 20005-3826
amsinfo@ametsoc.org Phone: 617-227-2425
Fax: 617-742-8718
Allen Press, Inc. assists in the online publication of AMS journals.


